blog

Beyond ‘Clean’ Data: Establishing a True Gold Standard for Provider Data

Written by HiLabs | Jun 18, 2025 1:13:37 PM

Every healthcare leader acknowledges the need for a "Gold Standard" in provider data. But does anyone honestly know what achieving this standard involves today? Historically, a gold standard meant simply having error-free data. However, the definition has evolved significantly. In modern healthcare, a gold standard means actionable, interoperable, unified, continuously updated, and strategically valuable data. 

Health plans face a critical realization: outdated provider data is not merely an operational nuisance—it's a significant strategic liability. Recent analyses reveal alarming accuracy issues; studies by CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2024) indicate nearly 80% of provider directories contain inaccuracies.  Industry estimates suggest that up to 25% of provider data can change within a 90-day window, underscoring the need for continuous updates rather than periodic fixes.[1] Traditional approaches to provider data management are insufficient. 

This blog examines why the industry needs a new approach, explores the limitations of traditional "clean data" methods, and outlines a structured pathway to achieving a genuine gold standard using continuous, AI-driven provider data management. 

Why the ‘Clean Data’ Approach Fails 

The traditional idea of "clean" provider data assumes that, at some point, information is static. But healthcare is inherently dynamic: providers frequently retire, relocate, merge, or change affiliations. A McKinsey (2024) study found that nearly half of the provider listings remain incorrect—despite spending over $2 billion annually on directory maintenance.[1] 

Provider data changes constantly—manual cleanups, performed periodically, simply can't keep pace. As a result, outdated information often lingers in systems for months. According to the AMA (2024), once a provider record becomes inaccurate, it stays that way for an incredible 540 days on average. This proves, again, what we all know traditional data maintenance is reactive and unsustainable. [2] 

What are the Current Challenges in Provider Data Accuracy 

Some emerging factors have escalated provider data accuracy into an urgent priority: 

  1. Increased Regulatory Pressure: Recent regulations, such as the No Surprises Act (2022) and the Consolidated Appropriations Act (2023), have set stringent standards for directory accuracy. CMS now mandates quarterly updates to provider directories. Non-compliance leads directly to financial penalties and reputational harm.
  2. Evolving Consumer Expectations: Today’s consumers, accustomed to digital accuracy and immediacy in other industries, expect the same from healthcare. A Gartner survey (2024) found that 30% of consumers have delayed care due to inaccurate provider information, damaging trust and loyalty.[3]
  3. Growing Operational Complexity: The rapid rise of telehealth and ongoing industry consolidation add layers of complexity. Telehealth usage grew from under 1% in 2019 to 17% in 2023 (Becker’s Healthcare, 2023).[4]

What are the Root Causes of Poor Provider Data Accuracy  

At the heart of persistent provider data inaccuracies are fragmented, siloed systems. Information is often stored separately across credentialing, contracting, claims processing, and customer service databases, leading to inconsistencies. 

This fragmentation is exacerbated by outdated data exchange methods. According to the 2024 CAQH Index Report, a significant portion of administrative transactions in healthcare still rely on manual processes, such as phone, fax, and mail, contributing to delays and errors. [5] 

The consequences of these outdated practices on provider data are evident. A study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association found that only 27.9% of physicians had consistent practice location addresses across health insurer directories, highlighting the widespread inconsistency in provider data.[6] 

These findings underscore the urgent need for health plans to modernize their data management systems, transitioning from fragmented, manual processes to integrated, automated solutions to ensure data accuracy and reliability. 

What is the True Gold Standard of Provider Data? 

The true gold standard of provider data is not defined by the state of data but by the process of managing it. Establishing a gold standard today requires a shift from periodic data cleanups to continuous, AI-driven data management. The ideal system, known as a "golden record," aggregates data from multiple sources—credentialing details, claims data, contractual records, and external sources such as NPI registries—into a unified profile and then continuously validates that record. 

AI-driven automation can now continuously validate provider data, flag inconsistencies, and instantly update records. Unlike manual checks and simple automations, AI powered workflows operate dynamically, constantly refining provider information to reflect real-time changes. 

What are the Advantages of AI-Enhanced Provider Data Management 

Implementing AI-driven, continuously updated provider data offers significant strategic advantages: 

  1. Enhanced Member Experience: Accurate provider directories play a critical role in shaping member experience. When health plan members can easily find the right provider without errors, they’re more likely to trust the plan and follow through with their care. A seamless, reliable search experience reflects directly on the health plan’s brand, fostering long-term satisfaction, loyalty, and word-of-mouth credibility. 
  2. Operational Efficiency: Automating data validation drastically reduces manual interventions and associated costs. McKinsey estimates administrative savings of $150-$300 million annually per $10 billion revenue for health plans using AI-driven systems.[7]
  3. Regulatory Compliance Confidence: AI ensures continuous compliance with regulatory standards, providing audit-ready documentation at any given moment, dramatically reducing compliance risks and associated financial penalties.
  4. Improved Network Management: Reliable data enables strategic decision-making, streamlined provider onboarding, and more effective network gap analysis, creating stable, competitive provider networks.

What are the Steps to Achieving the Gold Standard of Provider Data 

To successfully transition toward a true gold standard, health plans should consider these strategic actions: 

  1. Establish Provider Data Governance: Clearly define roles, responsibilities, and accountability for provider data accuracy, making it an organizational priority rather than just an IT issue.
  2. Unify Data Sources: Use new tools to integrate disparate data into a single, centralized solution, ensuring consistent, accurate information across the entire enterprise.
  3. Leverage AI and Automation: Implement AI-driven solutions that proactively identify, verify, and rectify data inconsistencies, reducing dependency on manual interventions.
  4. Adopt Continuous Improvement Loops: Employ continuous feedback loops using real-time data inputs, provider feedback, and claims data to refine and validate provider information constantly.
  5. Engage Expert Partners: Stretched IT teams have plenty to solve for without spending the time or focus hand crafting AI solutions. Organizations of any size can collaborate with technology partners specializing in healthcare data management, offering tailored AI solutions and industry-specific expertise.

HiLabs: Setting the New Standard in Provider Data 

The nation's top health plans are no longer settling for “clean enough” provider data—and neither are we. At HiLabs, we’re powering a new era of accuracy, access, and action. We deliver results where legacy solutions fall short. 

Our AI-native platform transforms provider data from a fragmented liability into a unified strategic asset. HiLabs ensures data is continuously accurate, interoperable, and actionable. This helps payers reduce administrative costs, stay audit-ready, and improve one of healthcare’s most critical outcomes: access to care.

We’re not just fixing provider data. We’re redefining what it should be. 

Are you ready to set a new standard? 

  

Sources: 

  1. https://www.healthcareittoday.com/2024/08/14/the-path-to-more-accurate-provider-data/ 
  2.  https://www.ajmc.com/view/persistence-of-provider-directory-inaccuracies-after-the-no-surprises-act? 
  3. https://www.techtarget.com/healthcarepayers/news/366603124/How-Inaccurate-Provider-Data-from-Payers-Impacts-Access-to-Care? 
  4. https://publichealth.jmir.org/2024/1/e51279/ 
  5. https://www.caqh.org/hubfs/Index/2024%20Index%20Report/CAQH_IndexReport_2024_FINAL.pdf 
  6. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2802329 
  7. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/sustainable-inclusive-growth/charts/an-ai-opportunity-for-health-insurers